Legal Opinion
State v. Mehl
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 21, 1992No. 91-186PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
602 So.2d 1383 (1992)
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
David MEHL, Appellee.
No. 91-186.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
August 21, 1992.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James N. Charles, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Flem K. Whited, III, of Lambert & Whited, Daytona Beach, and Mark S. Troum of Troum & Wallsh, Winter Park, for appellee.
GRIFFIN, Judge.
The state appeals an order entered by the trial court granting the motion of defendant, David Mehl ("defendant"), to suppress the results of a test of the alcohol level in his blood.[1] We reverse.
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. SaufleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- State v. ReisnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- State v. BurkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Mehl v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Phillips v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- State v. McRobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993