Legal Opinion

H. Hafner & Sons, Inc. v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Sewer District

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1997No. C-960648PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shannon, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants H. Hafner & Sons, Inc. and Toad, Inc. (“Hafner”) allege that in 1994, a sanitary sewer line operated across their land “erupted” and deposited raw sewage and human waste over approximately two acres of their property.

The record reveals that the sewer line in question is an interceptor sewer that receives sanitary flow during dry weather and a combination of sanitary flow and storm-water runoff during wet weather. This flow is conveyed by the sewer line to the Little Miami Treatment Plant (“the Plant”). Apparently, the Plant would be flooded and damaged by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. C&D Partnership v. City of GahannaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Masley v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Alden v. Summit CountyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Essman v. PortsmouthOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Coleman v. Portage County EngineerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Franklin v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Inland Products, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Bauer v. BrunswickOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API