Legal Opinion

United States v. Clarence Brantley, Sr., AKA Clarence Scott

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 29, 1991No. 89-9022PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Appellant Clarence Brantley, Sr., brings a pro se appeal from the district court’s denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion attacking the legality of that court’s imposition of a special parole term for his violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). Brantley pleaded guilty to Count Eight of an indictment, charging him with “knowingly and intentionally possessing] with intent to distribute a quantity of cocaine, a Schedule II narcotic controlled substance ...” on October 15, 1984. Rl-21 (emphasis added). The district judge sentenced him on Count Eight to five years imprisonment and to ten years special…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Steven Hessen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Judith Perez, Marjorie ConradeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellee v. James E. Humphreys, Jr., Defendant-Petitioner-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Nicholas HincapieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API