Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Peck

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 13, 1823PublishedCited by 6 opinions

„ * . From the Mason Circuit Court, the Iíoii. A'darfi, Beatty * r , ’ ... J Judge. ■ „ ,,,

1Opinion of the Court

*125O.pisrrok op the Co out, by

Judcíe Mills. .

Elijah Thornberry bought, or agreed to buy of liam Peck,-*a lot or lots in Williamsburg, and.fpr .the price executed his three notes of one each, payable at different and distant days./fÓne °f these notes^Peck sold and assigned to James Fitzgerald, and the remaining.two he sol'd and assigned to Thomas Harrison, who afterwards sold and assigned, them-' to said Fitzgerald, whereby he became proprietor- of all three. After they became due, Fitzgerald sued T^orn-berry, and obtained judgments at law, which -were.enjoined by Thornberry, on the ground that…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wyche v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Alexander v. Owen CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Nowlin v. PyneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Dailey v. JessupSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. Heacock v. FlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API