Legal Opinion
Hamid v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 5, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01601Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NAZIR HAMID, Case No. 20-cv-01601-VC Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE JUDGMENT AND DENYING COMPANY, et al., DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 30, 34 Nazir Hamid brings this suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act based on Metropolitan Life Insurance’s refusal to pay him short-term disability (STD) and long-term disability (LTD) income benefits under his employment benefits plan. Hamid applied for STD and LTD…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Wanda Glenn v. Metlife (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) and Long Term Disability Plan for Associates of Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Salomaa v. Honda Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Muniz v. Amec Construction Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.