Legal Opinion
Corn v. Rosenthal
New York Court of Common Pleas
Decided November 7, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from eleventh district court.- Action by Samuel and Henry Corn against Joseph Rosenthal for rent. From a judgment entered on a verdict directed for defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.
This action was brought to recover the first installment of rent which had accrued under an alleged lease in writing as follows:
“New York, Dec. 18th, 1891.
“It is hereby agreed between Samuel & Henry Corn & Joseph Rosenthal that the said Samuel & Henry Corn do lease unto the said Joseph Rosenthal the part of store & basement of 127 Greene St. from February 1st, 1892, to February 1st, 1893, at the annual rent of $1,000, payable monthly in advance, except such portion of the store which is now occupied by Hockmeyer Bros., which has nothing to do with said lease.
[Signed] “Samuel & Henry Corn.
“Jose…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Kavanagh v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Gildersleeve v. . LandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Reynolds v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- New York Small Stock Co. v. Third Ave. RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Cartledge v. CrespoCity of New York Municipal Court · 1893
- Corn v. RosenthalNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Conrad v. RosenthalNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
- Gair v. AuerbachNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.