In the Matter of Luloff
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
This is the second appeal concerning appellant Norm Luloffs attempt to condemn privately-owned land for a public road to his landlocked property. See Iowa Code § 471.4(2) (1989). 1 In the prior appeal, we affirmed the district court’s order that the condemnation could proceed, but imposed a condition on remand that a deficiency in the proposed route be corrected. In re Luloff, 512 N.W.2d 267, 269 (Iowa 1994) [hereinafter Luloff I]. Thereafter, upon expiration of the time for correction of this deficiency, the district court found Luloff had failed to comply with the required…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hyler v. GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Hockenberg Equipment Co. v. Hockenberg's Equipment & Supply Co. of Des Moines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Incorporated City of Denison v. ClabaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Matlock v. WeetsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Kuhlmann v. PersingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Owens v. BrownlieSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- In Re Estate of HurtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Fettkether v. City of ReadlynCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1999
- Comes v. City of AtlanticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.