Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Luloff

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 17, 1997No. 96-847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

This is the second appeal concerning appellant Norm Luloffs attempt to condemn privately-owned land for a public road to his landlocked property. See Iowa Code § 471.4(2) (1989). 1 In the prior appeal, we affirmed the district court’s order that the condemnation could proceed, but imposed a condition on remand that a deficiency in the proposed route be corrected. In re Luloff, 512 N.W.2d 267, 269 (Iowa 1994) [hereinafter Luloff I]. Thereafter, upon expiration of the time for correction of this deficiency, the district court found Luloff had failed to comply with the required…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hyler v. GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Hockenberg Equipment Co. v. Hockenberg's Equipment & Supply Co. of Des Moines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Incorporated City of Denison v. ClabaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Matlock v. WeetsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Kuhlmann v. PersingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Owens v. BrownlieSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. In Re Estate of HurtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Fettkether v. City of ReadlynCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1999
  5. Comes v. City of AtlanticSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API