Wallace v. Executors of McMicken
Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati
Special Term. — Proceeding by the plaintiff as a judgment creditor of Andrew McMicken, to subject whatever interest or estate McMicken may be entitled to under the will of his uncle, Charles McMicken, deceased. The provisions of the will are sufficiently stated in the decision of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStorer, J.
The object of this bill is to charge whatever estate, real or personal, vested by law in Andrew McMicken, under the will of Charles McMicken, deceased.
The' plaintiff is the judgment creditor of Andrew McMicken, who is represented as possessing no property that can be reached on execution.
We have been referred to several clauses in the will of Charles McMicken, which, it is claimed, give to Andrew McMicken, either legal or equitable interests that we may charge with the payment of the plaintiff’s judgment.
*565First, our attention is directed to the fourth article, which devises several small…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Webster v. GilmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1841
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hardenburgh v. BlairNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878