Allen v. State

Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was convicted of possession of pethidine, possession of cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute marijuana. We affirm.

1. Defendant contends that because the contraband was found inside a house he occupied with another individual who had “equal access” to it, his conviction of the above offenses was improper. Defendant argues, citing Blankenship v. State, 135 Ga. App. 482 (218 SE2d 157), that, at best, the state’s evidence showed that a person other than the defendant had equal opportunity to commit the offenses — that the evidence failed to connect…