Legal Opinion

Emmons v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1925No. A-5224PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant.

Several contentions are made in the brief of defendant, some of which are not borne out by the record. Before going to trial the defendant filed a motion to suppress and exclude evidence obtained by virtue of the search warrant, for the reason that the affidavit is insufficient, and the warrant thereon was illegal and without authority of law, which motion was overruled, and exceptions taken. Treating the affidavit as sufficient in form, it alleges that intoxicating liquors are kept on the southwest quarter of section 1, township 19…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bohannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Preston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Shanks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API