Legal Opinion

Willis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 1, 1999No. 99-1133PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Cecil Ray Willis appeals his sentence imposed after violation of probation, arguing that the trial court erred in refusing to resentence him as a youthful offender. Under section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1997), a trial court may impose a non-youthful offender sentence on a youthful offender who commits violations of probation that involve new substantive offenses. See Hill v. State, 692 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Dunbar v. State, 664 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Johnson v. State, 678 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Here, appellant violated his probation by committing two new substantive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Dunbar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldwire v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Schneider v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Flores v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API