Garvar v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.
In this proceeding wherein plaintiffs seek judgment declaring that rule 177C-AC-1 of the Rules and Regulations promulgated by thé Commissioner of Water 'Supply, Gas and Electricity, requiring that air-conditioning systems in excess of two tons of rated capacity using city water be equipped with an approved water-conserving device, be declared null and void as to plaintiffs’ air-conditioning unit and for permanent injunctive relief against any future action by the defendants with respect to such unit, the plaintiffs move for .summary judgment.
*563The moving papers disclose that the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Adamec v. PostNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. KlufusNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1956
- Caton Dahill Minute Auto Laundry, Inc. v. CarneyNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Milmic Realty Corp. v. Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Oriental Boulevard Co. v. HellerNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Kennilworth Management Co. v. City of IthacaNew York Supreme Court · 1970