Legal Opinion

Garvar v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.

In this proceeding wherein plaintiffs seek judgment declaring that rule 177C-AC-1 of the Rules and Regulations promulgated by thé Commissioner of Water 'Supply, Gas and Electricity, requiring that air-conditioning systems in excess of two tons of rated capacity using city water be equipped with an approved water-conserving device, be declared null and void as to plaintiffs’ air-conditioning unit and for permanent injunctive relief against any future action by the defendants with respect to such unit, the plaintiffs move for .summary judgment.

*563The moving papers disclose that the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Adamec v. PostNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. People v. KlufusNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1956
  4. Caton Dahill Minute Auto Laundry, Inc. v. CarneyNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Milmic Realty Corp. v. Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oriental Boulevard Co. v. HellerNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kennilworth Management Co. v. City of IthacaNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API