Legal Opinion

Bolles v. Cantor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff, Charles' I. Bolles, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day of March, 1896, denying his motion to vacate and set aside an order substituting Richard D. Schell as defendant in the action, in-place and stead of Jacob A. Cantor, as receiver of The Piqua Club Association.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.:

This action was begun on or about January 20, 1896, by the service of a summons and complaint upon the defendant Cantor, as- receiver of the Piqua Club Association, to compel such receiver to transfer upon the books of the company certain shares of stock: upon the surrender of the certificate of stock held' by the plaintiff. One Richard D. Schell, claiming to be the owner of such certificate, obtained an order directing the parties to show cause why he should not be impleaded as a party defendant. TJpon the return day of the order to show cause the attorneys for the plaintiff…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flewellin v. LentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API