Legal Opinion

Dean v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1940No. 27885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. An alleged statement of facts not being set forth in the bill of exceptions or made a part of the same as an exhibit and properly authenticated, what purports to be an agreed statement of facts, specified in the bill of exceptions as such and sent up as part of the record, but not approved by the judge and ordered filed, can not be considered by this court. Continental Life &c. Insurance Co. v. Hand, 24 Ga. App. 476 (101 S. E. 193); Federal Investment Co. v. Ewing, 165 Ga. 435 (141 S. E. 65). The assignments of error necessitating a consideration of the evidence can not be considered. It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Investment Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Continental Life & Health Insurance v. HandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. State Highway Department v. AttawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API