Conway v. California Adult Authority
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The petition for habeas corpus in this case, which was filed in the District Court for the Northern District of California and which was prepared by petitioner pro se, attacked the constitutionality of petitioner’s confinement in the state prison system pursuant to the California Indeterminate Sentence Law. Petitioner recited that he was convicted in 1952 on two counts of first-degree robbery and was given consecutive sentences of not less than five years each, with no maximum prescribed by law. California law provides that where no maximum term is set, the punishment shall be life…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Roy Edward Raines v. United States of America, Michael Pasterchik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Curtis Garrett v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Hester v. CravenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
- James X. Conway v. I. Slaughter, Psychiatrist, California Medical Facility, and Fifty-Eight OthersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- People v. BlossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.