Legal Opinion

State v. Mee

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 2017No. 27429PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals from the trial court's decision of January 26, 2017 sustaining in part and overruling in part a motion to suppress filed by Defendant-appellee, Matthew I. Mee. The State argues that the trial court erred by sustaining Mee's motion in part with respect to evidence obtained as the result of a search of Mee's vehicle during a traffic stop. In its decision, the trial court determined that the search was unlawful because Mee was detained for a longer interval than was reasonably necessary. We find that Mee's detention did not last longer than…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KincaidOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. State v. MeeOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API