State v. Mee
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtTucker, J.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals from the trial court's decision of January 26, 2017 sustaining in part and overruling in part a motion to suppress filed by Defendant-appellee, Matthew I. Mee. The State argues that the trial court erred by sustaining Mee's motion in part with respect to evidence obtained as the result of a search of Mee's vehicle during a traffic stop. In its decision, the trial court determined that the search was unlawful because Mee was detained for a longer interval than was reasonably necessary. We find that Mee's detention did not last longer than…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KincaidOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. MeeOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2026