Mildner v. Gulotta
District Court, E.D. New York
1DissentWeinstein, District Judge
Despite my high regard for New York’s tradition in maintaining the high ethical standards of its bar, I reluctantly conclude that its disciplinary procedure is constitutionally infirm in denying attorneys the due process and equal protection guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. There is no inconsistency between fair treatment of lawyers and maintenance of the long tradition of their discipline by the courts. There is no good reason why members of the legal profession, who have done so much to protect the constitutional rights of oth*202ers, should be deprived…
2Cases cited160 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.