Legal Opinion
Smith v. Astrue
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided September 13, 2012No. 5:10-CV-84 (NAM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
NORMAN A. MORDUE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Ricardo Smith brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of the decision by defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, to deny his application for supplemental security income. Plaintiff alleges that he has been disabled since December 15, 1996, due to blindness of the left eye, internal derangement of the right knee, facet disease of the lumbosacral spine, a herniated disc, spondylolisthesis, and an aneurysm.
On October…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Patricia H. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2026
- Rosario v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020