Schermerhorn v. Sayles
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
Suit for damages on account of the alleged breach of the covenants of a lease.
The lease was given by the defendant to the plaintiff and covered a storeroom in a certain building in Seattle. It was dated September 20, 1919, and was to run for four years. This instrument provided that the lessor should be required to furnish “heat and hot water at all seasonable times of the year without any charges to the lessee therefor.” It was understood at the time of the making of the lease that'the premises *140would be used as a barber shop. In fact, we believe it is expressly so stated in the lease. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mitchell v. Guaranty State Bank of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Matzger v. Arcade Building & Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Purcell v. WarburtonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Brinnon Logging Co. v. Carlsborg Mill & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Woodward v. BlanchettWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Graham Hotel Co. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Dehoney v. GjardeWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Pappas v. ZerwoodisWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Schultz v. Wells Butchers' Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.