Legal Opinion

Crisp County Lumber Co. v. Bridges

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1939No. 12566PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Brewing Justice.

1. “The tenant for life shall be entitled to the full use and enjoyment of the property if in such use he exercises the ordinary care of a prudent man for its preservation and protection, and commits no acts tending to the permanent injury of the person entitled in remainder or reversion. Eor the want of such care and the wilful commission of such acts, he shall forfeit his interest to the remainderman, if he shall elect to claim immediate possession.” Code, § 85-604. “Equity seeks always . . to relieve against forfeitures, where the rules of construction will…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. LeverettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Bowman v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  3. Barmore v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Smith v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Keesecker v. BirdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Farmers' Mutual Fire & Lightning Insurance v. CrowleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. Board of Ed. of Paulding Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Board of Education v. Winding Gulf CollieriesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  5. Converse v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API