Legal Opinion
State v. Barro
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1958No. 8859PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLADNEY, Judge.
This is an action by the State, instituted through summary procedure as provided in LSA-R.S. 47:1574, for the purpose of collecting from the defendant sales taxes alleged to have accrued for the period of January 1, 1948, through June 7, 1948. Under the prescribed procedure the Collector of Revenue for the State of Louisiana filed on' December 29, 1954, a rule upon the defendant', Abe Barro, to show cause on January 5, 1955, why he should not be condemned to pay taxes in the sum of $60. Attached to the complaint was a verified statement of the claim. The rule was not tried on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Whittington v. Heirs of PeguesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Saenger Amusement Co. v. MasurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Merchants' & Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Hammond Motors Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Greater New Orleans Homestead Ass'n v. KornerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. John the Baptist School Board v. Marbury-Pattillo Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- State v. BarroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- State v. BarroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- State v. BarroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958