Legal Opinion

Uniroyal, Inc. v. George K. Hood, Defendants-Third Party Usco Services, Inc., Third Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 25, 1979No. 76-2997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:

In this Georgia diversity case, Uniroyal, Inc., a New Jersey corporation with its principal place of business in Connecticut, appeals from a judgment denying recovery from Hood Brothers, a Georgia partnership, and Sam Hodges Company, a Georgia corporation, for damage to shoes stored in a warehouse owned by Hood Brothers and leased to Uniroyal. The damage occurred, consequent to a severe storm, when rainwater flowed into the warehouse after running off an adjacent construction site, also owned by Hood Brothers, upon which Sam Hodges Company, a general contractor, was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Goble v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Brand v. Montega Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. City of Atlanta v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Ohlen v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Uniroyal, Inc. v. George K. Hood, Defendants-Third Party Usco Services, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API