Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Haydu
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BASKIN, Judge.
In its Order Striking Pleadings of Defendant and Entering Default, the trial court found:
1.The Defendant, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, has willfully and flagrantly violated and refused to comply with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, as they pertain to discovery, and with Orders of the trial court compelling discovery. For example, in the hearing before this Court, conducted on November 12, 1981, Defendant’s counsel admitted and conceded that not a single document, paper or exhibit has ever been delivered to the Plaintiff or her counsel, pursuant to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- United Services Auto. Ass'n v. StrasserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Zafirakopoulous v. South Miami Intern. Crabhouse Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Kleinschmidt v. GATOR OFFICE SUPPLY AND FURNITURE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Kranz v. LevanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992