Legal Opinion

Foster v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1936No. 32,619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This appeal is concerned with the validity of a provision of the emergency fee-and-salary act of 1933, which temporarily superseded the preexisting statute touching the sheriff’s per diem allowance for attending the county jail.

Plaintiff was elected sheriff of Harper county at the November election in 1932 and was inducted into office in January, 1933. At that time and for many years prior thereto the statute (Laws 1913, ch. 197, § 12, R. S. 28-110) contained a provision which read:

“The sheriffs of the several counties in the state shall…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Coleman v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Gleason v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. First National Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Jackson v. School District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Cunningham v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. Banister v. CarnesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API