Legal Opinion

Larcade v. Iseringhausen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 1, 1922No. 25131PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action by Walter Larcade, Willie Larcade, and others against TJrsin T. Iseringhausen and others. An injunction was denied, and a suspensive appeal refused, and tlie plaintiffs named apply for writs of prohibition and mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

By Division B, composed of Justices O’NIELL, LAND, and BAKER.

LAND, J.

On February 20, 1922, relators, Walter and Willie Larcade, applied to the judge of the Sixteenth judicial district court for an injunction against Ursin T. Isering-hausen and the sheriff of the parish of St. Landry, prohibiting and enjoining them from executing the judgment of this court rendered July 14, 1920, in the case of Ursin T. Iseringhausen et al. v. Larcade et al. (No. 23991), 147 La. 515, 85 South. 224, on the docket of this court, on the ground that the said Iseringhausen and the said sheriff were endeavoring to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Iseringhausen v. LarcadeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alfano v. FranekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Collier v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  3. Larcade v. IseringhausenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Guidry v. Cytec IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. General Finance Co. of Louisiana v. VeithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API