United States v. Jarvis Maurice Williams

Jarvis Williams appeals his convictions for carjacking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119, and for discharging a firearm in relation to a carjacking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(iii). No reversible error has been shown; we affirm.

On appeal, Williams argues that the district court erred by allowing testimony on, and admitting into evidence, victim Terrence Ball’s out-of-court identification of Williams. Williams contends the out-of-court identification procedure was imper-missibly suggestive because Williams was the only person to appear in each of two separate photographic spreads…