Legal Opinion

(PC) Frazier v. Matteson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 10, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00188Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEMAJ LEON FRAZIER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00188-AWI-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE PRIOR MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 13 v. (ECF Nos. 37, 38) 14 MATTESON, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S NEW MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 15 Defendants. PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b) 16 (ECF No. 38) 17 18 Plaintiff Semaj Leon Frazier (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se and in 19 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On December 16, 2019,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  2. R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. O'Malley-Keyes v. EatonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1928
  4. Coastal Transfer Co. v. Toyota Motor SalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API