Legal Opinion

In re Itron, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 21, 2018No. 17-60733PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:

This mandamus petition calls on us to correct a significant misapplication of attorney-client privilege law. The underlying lawsuit springs from a disputed corporate merger. Plaintiff-Petitioner Itron acquired a company called SmartSynch. According to Itron, misrepresentations by three of SmartSynch's corporate officers ("Defendants") caused it unknowingly to assume an unwanted $60 million contractual obligation to a third company, Consert. After years of litigation, Itron settled Consert's claims against it for $18 million. Itron now sues Defendants for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In re: Gregg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. In re: Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Charles BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Taylor Lohmeyer Law Firm v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  5. In Re Jefferson ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API