Legal Opinion

Florida Parole & Probation Commission v. Baranko

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1982No. AD-229PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Florida Parole and Probation Commission appeals from a- trial court order denying its motion for rehearing of a writ *1087of mandamus and requiring it to conduct a de novo parole hearing for the benefit of appellee. „

The only question presented is whether notice of a meeting of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission published in the Florida Administrative Weekly is sufficient public notice under the “sunshine law,” Section 286.011, Florida Statutes. We hold, as a matter of law, that it is.

The Florida Parole and Probation Commission is subject to both the sunshine law and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maryland Cas. Co. v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Turner v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Wainwright v. TurnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. City of Winter Garden v. NORFLOR CONST.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Florida Institutional Legal Services, Inc. v. Florida Parole & Probation CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API