Allstate Insurance Co. v. Victor Ginsberg
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
351 F.3d 473
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Allstate Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,
v.
Victor GINSBERG, Elaine A. Scarfo, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
No. 99-10983.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
DECIDED November 14, 2003.
Maurice J. Baumgarten, Anania, Bandklayder & Blackwell, Miami, FL, Martha Ann Chapman, Orlando, FL, for Ginsberg and Scarfo.
David Bryan Shelton, Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Before ANDERSON and…
Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lewis; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Anstead; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lewis.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Scarfo v. GinsbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- National U. Fire Ins. Co. v. Lenox Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Cason v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Ponton v. ScarfoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.