Legal Opinion

Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. N.A.S.T., Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 12, 2003No. 02 C 1272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior J.

This diversity action between Dunkin’ Donuts, Inc. (“Dunkin”) and certain of its franchisees — as before, this opinion -will continue to use the name “Cherian,” treated as a personified singular male noun, to refer to franchisee Sunny Cherian and N.A.S.T., Inc. — has been distressingly acrimonious. 1 In any event, Cherian met DunMn’s Complaint for asserted violation of the Franchise Agreements between them with an attack — a 96 paragraph, nine count Counterclaim.

When Dunkin’ then filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to the matters…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In re TCI Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Batton v. The National Association of RealtorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API