Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. N.A.S.T., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior J.
This diversity action between Dunkin’ Donuts, Inc. (“Dunkin”) and certain of its franchisees — as before, this opinion -will continue to use the name “Cherian,” treated as a personified singular male noun, to refer to franchisee Sunny Cherian and N.A.S.T., Inc. — has been distressingly acrimonious. 1 In any event, Cherian met DunMn’s Complaint for asserted violation of the Franchise Agreements between them with an attack — a 96 paragraph, nine count Counterclaim.
When Dunkin’ then filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to the matters…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- In re TCI Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Batton v. The National Association of RealtorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022