Royal Indemnity Co. v. Terra Firma, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
The principal issue in this matter is whether the defendant Konover Construction Corporation (Konover), the general contractor for a construction project, is entitled to coverage as an “additional insured” under a policy procured by Soneco/Northeastem, Inc. (Soneco), 1 a subcontractor, pursuant to a construction agreement. All parties, with the exception of Soneco, 2 have moved for partial summary judgment as to the coverage issue and have submitted voluminous materials advancing their positions. I agree that there is no genuine issue of fact and that partial summary judgment as to coverage…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Kinney v. G. W. Lisk Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First Mercury Insurance v. Shawmut Woodworking & Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Terra Firma, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Mowrey v. WindhamDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020