Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Terra Firma, Inc.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 25, 2006No. MMX04-CV05-4005063SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The principal issue in this matter is whether the defendant Konover Construction Corporation (Konover), the general contractor for a construction project, is entitled to coverage as an “additional insured” under a policy procured by Soneco/Northeastem, Inc. (Soneco), 1 a subcontractor, pursuant to a construction agreement. All parties, with the exception of Soneco, 2 have moved for partial summary judgment as to the coverage issue and have submitted voluminous materials advancing their positions. I agree that there is no genuine issue of fact and that partial summary judgment as to coverage…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Kinney v. G. W. Lisk Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Mercury Insurance v. Shawmut Woodworking & Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Terra Firma, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Mowrey v. WindhamDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API