Legal Opinion
United States v. William L. Hamling
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 1973No. 72-1892 to 72-1897PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EAST, District Judge:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On March 5, 1971, the Grand Jury for the Southern District of California indicted the above-named defendants, William L. Hamling (Hamling), Earl Kemp (Kemp), Shirley R. Wright (Wright), David L. Thomas (Thomas), Reed Enterprises, Inc. (Reed), Library Service, Inc. (Library), the appellants, and Greenleaf Classics, Inc. (Greenleaf), on 21 counts of alleged violation of Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 2, 371 and 1461.
Count 1 charged the defendants and various other unindicted co-conspirators with conspiring to cause to be delivered by mail obscene…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.