Mathews v. Jackson Electric Membership Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, C. J.
The defendant contends that in the mandamus proceeding the plaintiffs took a certain legal position in which they prevailed and are now seeking to take an inconsistent legal position which they are estopped from doing. In their petition for mandamus the plaintiffs alleged: “Plaintiffs show that they have and will suffer pecuniary loss for which they cannot be compensated in damages, since they are prevented from having the use, convenience, pleasure, comfort and enjoyment of electrical appliances, to wit: from having a television, radio, water well pump, electric stove, refrigerator, electric…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hogansville Banking Co. v. City of HogansvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Head v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cruz v. OrtizSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Cruz v. OrtizSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961