Snedeker v. Vernmar, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
151 So.2d 439 (1963)
Agnes P. SNEDEKER et al., as and constituting the Florida Board of Massage, Appellants,
v.
VERNMAR, LTD., a limited partnership under the laws of the State of Florida, et al., Appellees.
No. 31412.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 20, 1963.
Rehearing Denied April 16, 1963.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Simmonite, Budd & Walsh and Garland M. Budd, Miami, for appellees.
DREW, Justice.
The complaint initiating this litigation was filed in July, 1958, by appellees, operators of Stauffer System reducing establishments, seeking a…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Drew; Concurrence · Thornal.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ansin v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Knowles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Harrell's Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIR. AUTH.Supreme Court of Florida · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northside Motors of Florida, Inc. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- University of Miami v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Richman v. ShevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- City of Cape Canaveral v. ChesnickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.