Legal Opinion

Larocque v. Conheim

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBogues, J.

The plaintiff alleges that Harriet Larocque was his daughter; that in January, 1902, the defendant wrongfully seduced and carnally knew her; that she was then aged nineteen years, was previously chaste and of good reputation; that said seduction- was accomplished under a promise of marriage, which the defendant did not intend to keep, but the same was made for the purpose of subjecting her to his lusts and debauching her; that by reason of such intercourse and cohabitation she became pregnant about the month of April, 1902; that at that time the defendant wrongfully “ caused her to submit to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whitford v. . the Panama Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Wade v. . KalbfleischNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. People v. . McGonegalNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Bartley v. . RichtmyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. White v. . NellisNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCandless v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Herko v. UvillerNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Reno v. D'JavidNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API