Legal Opinion

Franc v. Davidson

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.

The plaintiff has brought this action to declare that the acts and proceedings of the city of New York in readjusting the water rates are void. The present motion in part is one to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The city enacted a local law or ordinance on September 14, 1933, which fixed the rate complained of. There is no doubt that the board of aldermen has the power to regulate water rates. Sections 46 and 469 of the Greater New York Charter give such power.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elmhurst Fire Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Board of Education v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Johnson-Kahn Co. v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 8200 Realty Corp. v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API