Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Tyrrell

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On motion to dismiss bill.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The motion is made in virtue of the two hundred and thirteenth rule, and takes the place of a demurrer to the bill.

*16The case presented by the bill is this: James Tyrrell, for himself and as attorney in fact for others who are co-tenants with him of certain land in the city of Bayonne, on the 20th of April, 1894, agreed to sell that land to the complainant for $7,250, of which $250 were to be paid upon the execution of the agreement of sale and the balance was to be paid upon the delivery of the deed on the- 21st of the following May, $5,000 in cash and the remainder by…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Bakers Basin Realty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. La Prelle v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Zygmunt v. Avenue Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API