Legal Opinion

Deem v. Baron

District Court, D. Utah

Decided August 3, 2020No. 2:15-cv-00755Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION DARRELL L. DEEM, et. al., MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiffs, v. 2:15-CV-00755-DS TRACEY BARON, et. al., District Judge David Sam Defendants. Plaintiffs have filed two related post-judgment motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (ECF 358); and (2) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment (ECF 359). The second of these two motions is dependent on the first; i.e., the relief sought in Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment is expressly premised on the court’s first granting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & TrustDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  4. Hoxworth v. BlinderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API