Legal Opinion

Robert Grundstein, J.D. v. Maine Board of Bar Examiners, et al.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 3, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00402Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ROBERT GRUNDSTEIN, J.D., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:25-cv-00402-JAW ) MAINE BOARD OF BAR ) EXAMINERS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS In this pro se action against the Maine Board of Bar Examiners for embargoing a pro se litigant’s July 2021 Maine bar exam test score, the court grants a motion to dismiss the complaint based on principles of sovereign immunity, the failure to allege viable claims against the defendants in their personal capacities, the Rooker- Feldman doctrine, and principles of claim preclusion. I. BACKGROUND A.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API