Workman v. Continental Casualty Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Dissent
Maxwell, Judge:
For the reasons here presented Judge Hatcher and I respectfully dissent.
Where a person who is protected by accident insurance is killed or injured while engaged in an occupation obviously more dangerous than that named in his application and policy, what is the status of the contracting parties? There are three possible alternatives; (1) to deny all right of recovery under the policy, (2) to require the insurer to pay the indemnity regardless of change of vocation, or (3) to permit recovery for such an amount as the premiums paid by the insured would have purchased at the rate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowyer v. Continental Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
- Miller v. Missouri State Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- McCarthy v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Addison v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Newell v. Aetna Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923