Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lostocco v. D'Eramo

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 26, 1999No. A99A0253Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

I respectfully dissent. In Georgia, an indemnity clause must be strictly construed against the indemnitee. See, e.g., DeKalb County v. Lenowitz, 218 Ga. App. 884, 889 (4) (463 SE2d 539) (1995); McMichael v. Robinson, 162 Ga. App. 67, 69 (2) (290 SE2d 168) (1982). Here, the indemnity clause in the settlement agreement required D’Eramo to indemnify Lostocco “from and against any liability for federal taxes arising out of PLI and its operations.” It did not expressly require indemnification for the assessment of a penalty. The assessment against Lostocco, even though it may have been “assessed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SoteloSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Stallard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. GAF CORPORATION v. Tolar Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. DeKalb County v. LenowitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. McMichael v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API