Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE v. Heise

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1966No. 38678PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Solfisburg

At a bench trial in the criminal court of Cook County the defendant, Robert Heise, was found guilty of burglary, and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 40 nor more than 60 years.

Defendant contends that his constitutional rights were violated in that his written confession that he broke into a building was inadmissible and should have been suppressed under the doctrine of Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 12 L. Ed. 2d 977. He also contends that the evidence apart from the confession is unsatisfactory to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the conviction should be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. The People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. HesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. The PEOPLE v. MallettIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. People v. HartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. People v. CaldwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API