People v. Wilson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*807The defendant’s contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support his conviction, is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Stokes, 188 AD2d 627). The defendant was identified by two police officers who purchased cocaine from him in face-to-face transactions. The defendant was also identified by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. StokesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996