State v. Canty

Defendant, Dana Canty, convicted by a district court of three counts of aggravated robbery, Minn. St. 609.245, appeals from the judgment of conviction. We affirm.

Defendant’s conviction was based on substantially the same evidence as set forth in our opinion in State v. Seelye, 297 Minn. 478, 209 N. W. 2d 918 (1973). Defendant, Seelye, and one John Lindquist were similarly charged under the circumstances related in the Seelye opinion. Defendant raises the following issues on appeal: (1) Did the arrest, search, and seizure of defendant violate his constitutional rights? (2) Did the fact that…