Legal Opinion

Camden v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 11, 1974No. 25927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This appeal involves an interpretation of Colorado’s Inheritance and Succession Tax Statute as it existed in 1957. C.R.S. ’53, 138-4-1, et seq. Elva L. Camden, the daughter and sole heir of the deceased, in her capacity as executrix and sole legatee, asserts that the Colorado inheritance tax law does not require that an inheritance tax be paid on that part of a decedent’s gross estate which is used to pay Federal *133estate taxes. The appellant contends that the definition of “estate and property,” set forth in the Inheritance Tax Statute (C.R.S. ’53, 138-4-2), requires that the amount of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of GiolittiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Dines v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  3. State v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. People v. BemisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  5. In Re the Estate of CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MarquesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. People v. MarquesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API