People ex rel. Berkeley v. New York Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Motion for writ of peremptory mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.
The peremptory writ of mandamus prayed for cannot he allowed. The undisputed facts do not establish a clear, unequivocal right to the relief sought. Issues of fact on material questions are raised by the return which, at best, would permit. the allowance of an alternative writ; but I am satisfied that the relator has mistaken his remedy, and that he 'must seek redress by resort to the Code action substituted for the ancient quo warrarito proceedings. "
" The relator claims that he is still the secretary and a director of the defendant corporation, and asks that he be accorded inspection of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Railway-Frog Co. v. HavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- People ex rel. Griffin v. SteeleNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- People Ex Rel. Nicholl v. New York Infant AsylumNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- People ex rel. Coleman v. DikemanNew York Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minskoff v. Stocking Bar, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948