Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Berkeley v. New York Casualty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for writ of peremptory mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

The peremptory writ of mandamus prayed for cannot he allowed. The undisputed facts do not establish a clear, unequivocal right to the relief sought. Issues of fact on material questions are raised by the return which, at best, would permit. the allowance of an alternative writ; but I am satisfied that the relator has mistaken his remedy, and that he 'must seek redress by resort to the Code action substituted for the ancient quo warrarito proceedings. "

" The relator claims that he is still the secretary and a director of the defendant corporation, and asks that he be accorded inspection of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Railway-Frog Co. v. HavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. People ex rel. Griffin v. SteeleNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. People Ex Rel. Nicholl v. New York Infant AsylumNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. People ex rel. Coleman v. DikemanNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Minskoff v. Stocking Bar, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API