Legal Opinion
Opinion No. 77-168 (1977) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided June 3, 1977Published
1Opinion of the Court
CITIES AND TOWNS
Title 11 O.S. 659.1 [11-659.1] et seq. (1976), does not repeal by implication the power of the governing body of a city to vacate streets or other public places for purposes of urban renewal as set forth in the Urban Redevelopment Law, 11 O.S. 1601 [11-1601] — 11 O.S. 1624 [11-1624] (1971). The Attorney General has considered your request for an opinion wherein you ask the following question: "Did the passage of 11 Okla. Stat. 659.1, et seq., repeal by implication the provisions of the Urban Redevelopment Law granting the power to a governing body of a city to permanently…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Letteer v. Conservancy District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Wade v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Reubin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Koch v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.