Legal Opinion

Aames Funding Corp. v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 31, 2005No. A05A1224PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Aames Funding Corporation filed an action for reformation of a security deed following foreclosure to correct the legal description of the property. Ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment to the appellees, Daniel A. Henderson, Debra W. Henderson, and Charlotte T. Butler. We reverse.

In reviewing a grant or denial of summary judgment, this Court conducts a de novo review of the evidence. To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. Tokai Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Curry v. CurrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Phillips & Co. v. RoquemoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Chapman v. Cassels Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Coleman Road Associates, Ltd. v. CulpepperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. DeGolyer v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Federated Mutual Insurance v. Ownbey Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Ceasar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Gregorakos v. Wells Fargo National Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Ellison v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API