Legal Opinion
State v. Tucker
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 18, 1986No. 4797PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
In this appeal from a conviction of the crime of being an accessory to assault in the second degree, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-60 (a) (2) and 53a-8, the defendant raises three claims of error: (1) that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) that the court erred in refusing to charge that General Statutes § 53a-8 does not apply to an accessory after the fact; and (3) that the court erred in refusing to charge that proof of intent to employ a dangerous instrument was required under General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2).1
The jury could reasonably have found the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. BittingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. BaskinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- State v. AponteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. WashingtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.